Scott v. Jones
This text of 600 F. App'x 102 (Scott v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Larry W. Scott, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and [103]*103denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Jones, No. 5:13-cv-02870-DCN, 2014 WL 4823850 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 F. App'x 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-jones-ca4-2015.