Scott v. Israel

2 Binn. 145, 1809 Pa. LEXIS 45
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 19, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Binn. 145 (Scott v. Israel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Israel, 2 Binn. 145, 1809 Pa. LEXIS 45 (Pa. 1809).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have no doubt in this case. The attorney having marked his name generally, and in no part of the record having declared that he appeared for one in particular, must be presumed to have appeared for both; and the plea entered in this short way, must be referred to the appearance, and be considered as a plea for both. As to the defendant’s being summoned, it is not material, he may appear without summons.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Middletown v. Huntington
13 Abb. Pr. 402 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)
Blair v. Weaver
11 Serg. & Rawle 84 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1824)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Binn. 145, 1809 Pa. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-israel-pa-1809.