Scott v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scott v. Hults

26 A.D.2d 548, 271 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4054

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 548 (Scott v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Hults, 26 A.D.2d 548, 271 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles which suspended petitioner’s driver’s license for 30 days for violation of subdivision (b) of section 1163 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. By order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 21, 1965, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination annulled, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion no substantial evidence was adduced at the hearing to sustain the finding of the Beferee that petitioner had failed to signal his intention to make a left turn. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles which suspended petitioner’s driver’s license for 30 days for violation of subdivision (b) of section 1163 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. By order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 21, 1965, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination annulled, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion no substantial evidence was adduced at the hearing to sustain the finding of the Beferee that petitioner had failed to signal his intention to make a left turn. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 548, 271 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-hults-nyappdiv-1966.