Scott v. Hudgins

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 22, 2009
• Docket: 09-6051
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6051

JOEY D. SCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FNU HUDGINS, Sergeant; MATTHEW PENNELL; KEITH WHITENER; BOYD BENNETT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00137-GCM)

Submitted: July 20, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joey D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joey D. Scott appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint alleging

excessive force. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Scott v. Hudgins, No. 5:08-cv-00137-GCM

(W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2008). We deny all Scott’s pending motions,

including his motions for appointment of counsel, to “Dismiss

PLRA Procedure,” to compel discovery, to continue

videoconference hearing, for seizure of property/assets, and to

impose sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED