Scott v. Houk
This text of 123 Ohio St. 3d 1421 (Scott v. Houk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, No. 4:07-CV-0753. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6). The court will answer the following question:
“Is there a post-conviction or other forum to litigate the issue of whether Ohio’s lethal injection protocol is constitutional under Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35, 128 S.Ct. 1520 (2008), or under Ohio law?”
Motion to strike district court order denied as moot. Petitioner shall file a merit brief within 40 days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI and S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(7).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 Ohio St. 3d 1421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-houk-ohio-2009.