Scott v. Hogan

194 So. 3d 1094, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10269, 2016 WL 3581294
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 2016·No. No. 1D16-2773·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. We expedited review at Appellants’ request.

Appellants’ complaint raised two counts, one seeking a declaratory judgment that appellee Leigh’s write-in candidacy is a “sham” and therefore is not “opposition” within the meaning of Article VI, section 5(b) of the Florida Constitution, and the other a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm the dismissal of the first count based on Brinkmann v. Francois, 184 So.3d 504 (Fla.2016), and we affirm the dismissal of the second count without comment.

We also affirm without comment the issue raised on cross appeal.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Hogan, 194 So. 3d 1094, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10269, 2016 WL 3581294 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

194 So. 3d 1094 (Scott v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jennifer Brinkmann v. Tyron Francois, etc.
184 So. 3d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)