Scott v. Hoboken Bank for Savings
23 A.2d 399, 127 N.J.L. 564, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 208
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, He her, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. Hoboken Bank for Savings, 23 A.2d 399, 127 N.J.L. 564, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 208 (N.J. 1942).
23 A.2d 399 (Scott v. Hoboken Bank for Savings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.