Scott v. Herzog

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: March 6, 2024
• Docket: 3:22-cv-00564
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * *

4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III, Case No. 3:22-cv-00564-ART-CLB

5 Plaintiff, ORDER

6 v.

7 HERZOG, et al.,

8 Defendants.

10 Plaintiff James Scott moves the Court to provide him with 15 USM-285 forms and 11 copies of his operative complaint so he can “provide proper service” on each defendant. 12 (ECF No. 24). He also seeks an order requiring the prison’s law library to extend his 13 copywork limit. (Id. at 2). And in a separate motion, Plaintiff seeks leave to substitute 14 Cidney Pertney for defendant Nurse Jane Doe. (ECF No. 25). For the reasons discussed 15 below, Plaintiff’s motion for forms, copies, and a copywork extension is denied, and his 16 motion to substitute is granted. 17 I. DISCUSSION 18 A. Motion for forms, copies, and copywork extension (ECF No. 24) 19 Plaintiff’s first motion seeks 15 USM-285 forms, copies of his second amended 20 complaint, and to extend his copywork limit so he can serve the defendants under Federal 21 Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The Court entered an order on February 28, 2024, setting forth 22 the process for perfecting service under Rule 4. (ECF No. 23). Specifically, the Court 23 ordered that the Clerk of the Court will electronically serve the order and a copy of 24 Plaintiff’s second amended complaint on the Office of the Attorney General of the State 25 of Nevada. (Id. at 2). The Court ordered that the Attorney General’s Office will file notice 26 by March 21, 2024, advising the Court and Plaintiff the names of the defendants for whom 27 it accepts service, and for those defendants for whom it does not accept service, their last 1 defendant(s),” the Court ordered that “Plaintiff will file a motion identifying the unserved 2 defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and specifying a full name and address 3 for the defendant(s).” (Id.) 4 Plaintiff’s requests for USM-285 forms and copies of his second amended 5 complaint are not consistent with the Court’s February 28, 2024, order. Moreover, the 6 Attorney General’s Office has not filed its notice about acceptance of service required by 7 that order. Nor has the deadline for it to do so expired. Courts in this district have found 8 that they can order a prison to provide limited photocopying when it is necessary for an 9 inmate to provide copies to the court and other parties. See, e.g., Allen v. Clark Cnty. Det. 10 Ctr., Case No. 2:10-cv-00857-RLH, 2011 WL 886343, *2 (D. Nev. Mar. 11, 2011). But as 11 explained above, Plaintiff has no pressing need to send copies of any document to the 12 Court or parties. Plaintiff’s motion for forms, copies, and to extend his copywork limit is 13 therefore denied. 14 B. Motion to substitute defendant (ECF No. 25) 15 Plaintiff moves to substitute Cidney Pertney for defendant Nurse Jane Doe, 16 arguing he learned from prison correctional staff that is her true name. (ECF No. 25). 17 Plaintiff does not provide a proposed third amended complaint identifying Nurse Jane 18 Doe by name. In screening Plaintiff second amended complaint, the Court found he stated 19 sufficient facts about Nurse Jane Doe’s alleged misconduct and thus allowed the First 20 Amendment retaliation claim, Eighth Amendment medical-indifference claim about 21 sanitizing catheter sites and injuries sustained in non-ADA shower, and Eighth 22 Amendment claim about indifference to unsanitary prison conditions to proceed against 23 Nurse Jane Doe when Plaintiff learned her true name and obtained leave to substitute 24 her as a defendant in this action. (ECF No. 19 at 22–23). Considering the foregoing, the 25 Court finds that a third amended complaint merely to identify Nurse Jane Doe’s true name 26 is unnecessary. Plaintiff’s motion to substitute is therefore granted. 27 1 |Il. CONCLUSION 2 It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's motion for USM-285 forms, copies of the 3 second amended complaint, and to extend his copywork limit (ECF No. 24) is denied. 4 It is further ordered that Plaintiff's motion to substitute Cidney Pertney for defendant Nurse Jane Doe (ECF No. 25) is granted. 6 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court will add Cidney Pertney as a 7 | defendant on the Court’s docket. 8 It is further ordered that Plaintiffs second amended complaint (ECF No. 17) 9} remains his operative complaint. 10 11 Dated this 6th day of March 2024. ‘

12 gle 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28