Scott v. HEINONEN
989 A.2d 603, 295 Conn. 909
This text of 989 A.2d 603 (Scott v. HEINONEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scott v. HEINONEN, 989 A.2d 603, 295 Conn. 909 (Colo. 2010).
Opinion
Arthur E. SCOTT, Jr., Executor (Estate of Barbara H. Scott)
v.
Mark M. HEINONEN.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Francis G. Pennarola, Danbury, in support of the petition.
John D. Tower, Washington, DC, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn.App. 577, 985 A.2d 358 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Scott v. HEINONEN
985 A.2d 358 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
989 A.2d 603, 295 Conn. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-heinonen-conn-2010.