Scott v. Hart ex rel. Fassett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Scott v. Hart ex rel. Fassett

4 A. 206, 2 Sadler 529, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 716

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 24, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A. 206 (Scott v. Hart ex rel. Fassett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Hart ex rel. Fassett, 4 A. 206, 2 Sadler 529, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 716 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

It was not error to admit the deposition of Coleman. It certainly tended to corroborate the evidence of Corey. The other specifications of error relate to the charge of the court. While some portions thereof may be open to criticism, yet, taken as a whole, it presents the case fairly to the jury. We do not think it is either misleading in its effect, or partial in its character.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

It was not error to admit the deposition of Coleman. It certainly tended to corroborate the evidence of Corey. The other specifications of error relate to the charge of the court. While some portions thereof may be open to criticism, yet, taken as a whole, it presents the case fairly to the jury. We do not think it is either misleading in its effect, or partial in its character.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A. 206, 2 Sadler 529, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-hart-ex-rel-fassett-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack