Scott v. Hardaway
This text of 4 Munf. 263 (Scott v. Hardaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
the president pronounced the court’s opinion, that the action by one inspector against another, on the official bond of the latter, may well be maintained, and, consequently, that the demurrer was properly overruled by the County Court; but,that the record was defective in this, that the verdict of the jury assessing damages, on which the judgment was founded, did not appear therein ; and that the judgment of the County Court was erroneous in not attaching the recovery to future injuries.
Both judgments reversed, and new trial directed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Munf. 263, 18 Va. 263, 1814 Va. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-hardaway-va-1814.