Scott v. Gratigny

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scott v. Gratigny

183 So. 2d 584, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5559

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 1966

DocketNo. 63-747

StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 584 (Scott v. Gratigny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Gratigny, 183 So. 2d 584, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5559 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 7, 1964 (166 So.2d 816) affirming the summary judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed October 13, 1965 (182 So.2d 425) and mandate dated February 22, 1966, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance and remanded the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida,

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on September 10, 1964, is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed July 7, 1964 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the said summary judgment of the circuit court appealed from in this cause is reversed for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 7, 1964 (166 So.2d 816) affirming the summary judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed October 13, 1965 (182 So.2d 425) and mandate dated February 22, 1966, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance and remanded the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida,

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on September 10, 1964, is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed July 7, 1964 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the said summary judgment of the circuit court appealed from in this cause is reversed for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 So. 2d 584, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-gratigny-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack