Scott v. Gordon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scott v. Gordon

152 So. 2d 187, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3605

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 19, 1963

DocketNo. 3485

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 2d 187 (Scott v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Gordon, 152 So. 2d 187, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the action below, appellant as plaintiff sought recovery for personal injury and damage to his automobile sustained through a collision. The jury returned a verdict for defendants. The appeal is from the final judgment entered upon the [188]*188verdict. The defendants as appellees cross-assigned certain claimed errors which are not necessary to consider because of the result at which we arrive.

Appellant raises a single point, that the evidence received at the trial was insufficient to permit submission to the jury of the issue of contributory negligence. Our study of the record shows no reversible error in this regard. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, A. C. J., and ALLEN and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the action below, appellant as plaintiff sought recovery for personal injury and damage to his automobile sustained through a collision. The jury returned a verdict for defendants. The appeal is from the final judgment entered upon the [188]*188verdict. The defendants as appellees cross-assigned certain claimed errors which are not necessary to consider because of the result at which we arrive.

Appellant raises a single point, that the evidence received at the trial was insufficient to permit submission to the jury of the issue of contributory negligence. Our study of the record shows no reversible error in this regard. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, A. C. J., and ALLEN and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 2d 187, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-gordon-fladistctapp-1963.