Scott v. Francis

811 P.2d 927, 107 Or. App. 766, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1000
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 19, 1991
DocketA8412-07550; CA A46646; SC S37071
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 811 P.2d 927 (Scott v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Francis, 811 P.2d 927, 107 Or. App. 766, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1000 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinions

PER CURIAM

The Supreme Court granted review in this case and vacated our decisions, 311 Or 151,806 P2d 129 (1991), after it was determined that there had been no final, appealable judgment entered in the trial court. On remand, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s instructions, we granted the trial court leave to enter an appealable judgment. ORS 19.033(4). The trial court entered the judgment, and appellant has filed an amended notice of appeal.

Our opinion, 100 Or App 392, 786 P2d 1269 (1990), as modified on reconsideration, 104 Or App 39, 798 P2d 1111 (1990), is adopted and republished as the opinion of the court.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eclectic Investment, LLC v. Patterson
323 P.3d 473 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
Maurmann v. Del Morrow Construction, Inc.
48 P.3d 185 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Scott v. Francis
838 P.2d 596 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
811 P.2d 927, 107 Or. App. 766, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-francis-orctapp-1991.