Scott v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
This text of 533 So. 2d 310 (Scott v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sought mandamus in the lower court, contesting his presumptive parole release date. Jordan v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 423 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and the other cases upon which appellant relies were decided prior to the amendment of Rule 23-21.-011(3), F.A.C., which now expressly authorizes the aggregation of expired commitments without intervening periods of discharge. Appellant’s petition did not establish a basis for relief, and mandamus was properly denied.
We affirm the order appealed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
533 So. 2d 310, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2451, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4836, 1988 WL 117180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1988.