Scott v. Fidling

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 271
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 1, 1721
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 271 (Scott v. Fidling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Fidling, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 271 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1721).

Opinion

Upon reading the Petition and Affidavit of Joseph Scott and Anne his Wife preferred to this Court, setting forth that he is a very poor Man, and not worth £5 in the Whole World; and Therefore praying that he may be admitted in forma pauperis, to commence a Suit in this honourable Court against Daniel Fidling and others, for divers unjust and collusive dealings with the Petitioners; and that Council may be assigned him; and Mr. Whitaker thereupon moving to the Court on the Petitioners behalf; The Court doth grant the prayer of the said Petitioner; and Do assign Mr. Whitaker to be of his Council accordingly.

Intr.

Thos Lamboll Deputy Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-fidling-ctchansc-1721.