Scott v. Donovan
This text of 26 N.E. 871 (Scott v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The instruction to the jury as to the period covered by the time of the complainant’s travail was a correct interpretation of the Pub. Sts. c. 85, § 16. The language of the section has not been construed very strictly. Tacey v. Noyes, 143 Mass. 449. See Long v. Dow, 17 N. H. 470; Rodimon v. Reding, 18 N. H. 431.
It has been decided in this Commonwealth that the child may be exhibited to the jury. We see no sufficient reason for reconsidering the decision, or for taking a distinction according to age. The youth of the child goes rather to the weight of the evidence. Finnegan v. Dugan, 14 Allen, 197. Gaunt v. State, 21 Vroom, 490, 493.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 N.E. 871, 153 Mass. 378, 1891 Mass. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-donovan-mass-1891.