Scott v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co.
279 A.D. 975, 111 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5483
Opinion
Memorandum: The complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (See Beatty v. McCutcheon, 200 App. Div. 869.) A bill of particulars is no part of the pleadings and cannot enlarge a cause of action or perfect an imperfect pleading. (Dodge v. Weill, 158 N. Y. 346.) All concur. (Appeal from order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first cause of action, in a negligence action.) Present — 'Taylor, P. J., McCum, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co., 279 A.D. 975, 111 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 975 (Scott v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dodge v. . Weill
53 N.E. 33 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Beatty v. McCutcheon
200 A.D. 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)