Scott v. Denziger
137 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 675, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 162
This text of 137 A. 925 (Scott v. Denziger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scott v. Denziger, 137 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 675, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 162 (N.J. 1927).
Opinion
Memorandum.
The motion is to dismiss a rule to show cause held by defendant why a verdict against him should not he set aside. Such dismissal is asked upon the ground of lack of prosecution. There is an absolute lack of diligence. Nothing has been done under the rule since its allowance.
The motion is therefore granted and the rule dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 675, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-denziger-nj-1927.