Scott v. Daubert

159 So. 137
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 4, 1935·No. No. 16006.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mrs. Edna Mitchell, codefendant with William Daubert, through her attorneys, filed a motion to dismiss, the appeal of William Daubert upon the ground that it was filed in this court too late.

Defendant obtained an order for a devolu-tive appeal on December 7, 1934, from a judgment rendered in the civil district court on October 23, 1934, and in that order the return day was fixed as the 4th day of January, 1935. No order of extension was obtained and the transcript of appeal was not filed in this court until January 19, 1935. It is apparent, therefore, that the appeal must be considered as having been abandoned because filed too late. Roussel v. Guiterrez, 12 La. App. 701, 127 So. 1; Hotard v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., 14 La. App. 670, 130 So. 662; Schenck v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 15 La. App. 19, 130 So. 873.

For the reasons assigned, it is ordered that the motion to dismiss the appeal be sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Daubert, 159 So. 137 (La. Ct. App. 1935).

159 So. 137 (Scott v. Daubert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roussel v. Guiterrez
127 So. 1 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Hayes v. Carlton
127 So. 133 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Hotard v. Consolidated Companies
130 So. 662 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Schenck v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc.
130 So. 873 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)