Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Scott v. Daniel

Scott v. Daniel

2 S.W.2d 281
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 20, 1928
DocketNo. 397.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 2 S.W.2d 281 (Scott v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Daniel, 2 S.W.2d 281 (Tex. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

PANNILL, C. J.

This cause was tried in the district court of Jones county and at a term thereof that by law may continue in session six weéks. ' Acts Fortieth Legislature, chapter 32, page 44.

Judgment was rendered on May 12, 1927. Motion for new trial was made and overruled May 26, 1927. The term could not continue longer than May 28, 1927, and it was adjourned on that date. The appeal bond was filed June 22, 1927. This was too late. Where the term cannot continue longer than eight weeks, the appeal bond must be filed within 20 days áfte'r the expiration of the term. Webster v. Lucas (Tex. Sup.) 296 S. W. 1089.

The appeal is therefore dismissed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HSBC BANK USA v. Perkins
451 B.R. 555 (N.D. Alabama, 2011)
Pierce v. Pierce
115 N.E.2d 107 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1953)
People v. Hardt
67 N.E.2d 487 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1946)
Woodbury v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
166 S.W.2d 552 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1942)
Rodriguez v. Vallejo
157 S.W.2d 172 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Mauritz v. Bell
81 S.W.2d 730 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.W.2d 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-daniel-texapp-1928.