Scott v. Croasdale

1 Yeates 75
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1791·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Wilcocks was stopped by the court. They said the point was too clear to bear an argument. Lands in Pennsylvania, by the policy of the legislature, were made assets for the payment of debts; and the present case cannot be distinguished from a sale under a common judgment, fieri facias and venditioni exponas. The chief justice said, he perfectly recollected a similar determination in this court, about thirty years ago, when the opinions of several eminent counsel were read upon the argument, concurring with the resolution of the court.

Judgment for the tenant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Croasdale, 1 Yeates 75 (Pa. 1791).

1 Yeates 75 (Scott v. Croasdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porter v. Lazear
109 U.S. 84 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Nance v. Hooper
11 Ala. 552 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)
Corporation for the Relief of Poor Distressed Presbyterian v. Wallace
3 Rawle 109 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1831)