Scott v. Cox

Opinion

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00702-JAD-BNW Steven L. Scott, we Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio v. James Cox, et al., [ECF Nos. 53, 81] Defendants In this civil-rights case, Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler recommends that I deny Plaintiff Steven L. Scott’s motion to file an amended complaint as mot in light of her various September 10, 2020, orders.! The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was September 24, 2020, and no party filed an objection. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 81] is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Leave to Amend [ECF No. 53] is DENIED as moot. q CP 4 aspen U.S. District Judge/Jennifer A./Dorsey Dated: September 26, 2020 ECE No. 81. > Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).