Scott v. Commonwealth of Virginia
This text of 353 S.E.2d 460 (Scott v. Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted the petition in this criminal appeal to consider the question whether the Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the trial court did not err in refusing to strike a prospective juror for cause. Defendant sought to have the venireman stricken on the ground that he was employed by the business establishment which was the victim of the robbery charged to defendant.
We have considered the question and affirm the decision [6]*6appealed from, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported in 1 Va. App. 447, 339 S.E.2d 899 (1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 S.E.2d 460, 233 Va. 5, 3 Va. Law Rep. 1839, 1987 Va. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-va-1987.