Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TONIA SCOTT, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-41 : Petitioner : (Judge Conner) : v. : : COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, et al., : : Respondents :
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2024, upon consideration of the petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies.
2. A certificate of appealability will not issue because jurists of reason would not debate the correctness of this procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania (Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.