Scott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

622 F. App'x 230

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 5, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1183

StatusPublished

This text of 622 F. App'x 230 (Scott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, 622 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion..

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wanda Scott appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 6:13-cv-00943-MGL, 2015 WL 500736 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2015). We deny all of Scott’s pending motions, including her motions for a court order, to unmoot, for change of venue, for recusal, and for public [231]*231PACER. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion..

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wanda Scott appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 6:13-cv-00943-MGL, 2015 WL 500736 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2015). We deny all of Scott’s pending motions, including her motions for a court order, to unmoot, for change of venue, for recusal, and for public [231]*231PACER. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 F. App'x 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-commissioner-social-security-administration-ca4-2015.