Scott v. Com.

97 N.E.3d 691, 479 Mass. 1034
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 25, 2018·No. SJC–12335·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Scott challenges the denial of access to juror questionnaires used during the jury selection process. The single justice properly denied the petition because Scott failed to meet his burden of establishing that his challenge could not be effectively addressed as part of his pending appeal, or by other available avenues. See Bledsoe v. Commissioner of Correction, 470 Mass. 1017, 1018, 21 N.E.3d 542 (2014). His argument that the juror questionnaires should be part of the record on appeal does not justify the extraordinary intervention of this court. It is something that can adequately be addressed by the Appeals Court, where his appeal is pending, or by a single justice of the Appeals Court. For example, he could have sought a ruling as to the correct composition of the record from a single justice of the Appeals Court pursuant to Mass. R. A. P. 8 (e), as amended, 378 Mass. 932 (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Com., 97 N.E.3d 691, 479 Mass. 1034 (Mass. 2018).

97 N.E.3d 691 (Scott v. Com.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Scott
Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2020
Commonwealth v. Vines
117 N.E.3d 724 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2019)