Scott v. City of Norfolk

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. City of Norfolk

467 F. App'x 174

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 23, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2203

StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 174 (Scott v. City of Norfolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. City of Norfolk, 467 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-city-of-norfolk-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack