Scott v. City of Medford

893 P.2d 544, 133 Or. App. 711
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 31, 1995·No. 93-3457-E-1 CA A82610·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

893 P.2d 544 (1995)
133 Or. App. 711

Leilani SCOTT, Ellen Nelson, Lee Fitzsimmons and Susan Carrigan, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF MEDFORD, Oregon, Respondent.

93-3457-E-1; CA A82610.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted November 30, 1994.
Decided April 12, 1995.
Decision Adhered to as Modified on Reconsideration May 31, 1995.

G. Philip Arnold, Ashland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Drescher & Arnold, Ashland, Charles F. Hinkle and Katherine A. McDowell, Portland.

Eugene F. Hart, Jr., City Atty., waived appearance for respondent.

Melanie E. Mansell, Salem, filed a brief amici curiae for Lon Mabon, Loretta Neet, David Graham and No Special Rights Committee-PAC.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and LEESON, JJ.

Decision Adhered to as Modified on Reconsideration May 31, 1995. See 895 P.2d 816.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to declare charter amendment invalid and to enjoin its enforcement pursuant to ORS 659.165. deParrie v. State of Oregon, 133 Or.App. 613, 893 P.2d 541 (1995).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. City of Medford, 893 P.2d 544, 133 Or. App. 711 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

893 P.2d 544 (Scott v. City of Medford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. City of Medford
895 P.2d 816 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)