Scott v. Carew

Fifth Circuit

Scott v. Carew

121 F. 1021, 56 C.C.A. 684, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4729

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 24, 1903

DocketNo. 1,160

StatusPublished

This text of 121 F. 1021 (Scott v. Carew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Carew, 121 F. 1021, 56 C.C.A. 684, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4729 (5th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a careful examination and consideration of the elaborate decisions of Mr. Secretary Noble, Mr. Secretary Smith, Mr. Secretary Bliss, and Judge Locke, all found in the transcript, and all adverse to the claims of the appellants, and a study of the very able briefs filed by eminent counsel, we are of opinion that the judge of the Circuit Court properly ruled in sustaining the demurrer to the complainants’, bill; and therefore the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a careful examination and consideration of the elaborate decisions of Mr. Secretary Noble, Mr. Secretary Smith, Mr. Secretary Bliss, and Judge Locke, all found in the transcript, and all adverse to the claims of the appellants, and a study of the very able briefs filed by eminent counsel, we are of opinion that the judge of the Circuit Court properly ruled in sustaining the demurrer to the complainants’, bill; and therefore the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 F. 1021, 56 C.C.A. 684, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-carew-ca5-1903.