Scott v. Carew

Fifth Circuit

Scott v. Carew

121 F. 1021, 56 C.C.A. 684, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4729

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 24, 1903·No. No. 1,160·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a careful examination and consideration of the elaborate decisions of Mr. Secretary Noble, Mr. Secretary Smith, Mr. Secretary Bliss, and Judge Locke, all found in the transcript, and all adverse to the claims of the appellants, and a study of the very able briefs filed by eminent counsel, we are of opinion that the judge of the Circuit Court properly ruled in sustaining the demurrer to the complainants’, bill; and therefore the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a careful examination and consideration of the elaborate decisions of Mr. Secretary Noble, Mr. Secretary Smith, Mr. Secretary Bliss, and Judge Locke, all found in the transcript, and all adverse to the claims of the appellants, and a study of the very able briefs filed by eminent counsel, we are of opinion that the judge of the Circuit Court properly ruled in sustaining the demurrer to the complainants’, bill; and therefore the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Scott v. Carew, 121 F. 1021, 56 C.C.A. 684, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4729 (5th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

121 F. 1021 (Scott v. Carew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.