Scott v. Cardoza

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 30, 2016
DocketSCPW-16-0000575
StatusPublished

This text of Scott v. Cardoza (Scott v. Cardoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Cardoza, (haw 2016).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-16-0000575 30-AUG-2016 02:21 PM

SCPW-16-0000575

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

KIMBERLYN SCOTT and BROOKE SCOTT, Petitioners,

vs.

THE HONORABLE JOSEPH E. CARDOZA, Judge of the Circuit Court of

the Second Circuit, State of Hawai'i, Respondent Judge,

and

STEVEN CAPOBIANCO and STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CR. NO. 16-1-0133)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, J.J.)

Upon consideration of petitioners Kimberlyn Scott and

Brooke Scott’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on August 18,

2016, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support

thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioners do not have

a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief and,

therefore, they are not entitled to the requested writ of

mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d

334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy

that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear

and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested

action; such a writ is meant to restrain a judge of an inferior

court who has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a

flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act

on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in

which he or she has a legal duty to act). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 30, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott v. Cardoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-cardoza-haw-2016.