Scott v. Brown

24 N.W. 199, 33 Minn. 518, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJuly 8, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 24 N.W. 199 (Scott v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Brown, 24 N.W. 199, 33 Minn. 518, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 136 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Berby, J.

Tbe important question in this case was whether, at ■ the date of the commencement of this action, the statute of limitations had run against the notes in suit, and the answer to it depended upon whether the defendant was at a given time a resident of Iowa or of this state. That defendant was at one time a resident of Iowa clearly appeared. As to whether he had ceased to be such resident at the given time mentioned or not, the testimony was conflicting, but there certainly was competent evidence from which the jury might reasonably infer that he had not, and hence the verdict should not be disturbed.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 N.W. 199, 33 Minn. 518, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-brown-minn-1885.