Scott v. BRODHACKER

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scott v. BRODHACKER

248 S.W.3d 68, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 109, 2008 WL 170503

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 22, 2008

DocketED 89547

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 S.W.3d 68 (Scott v. BRODHACKER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. BRODHACKER, 248 S.W.3d 68, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 109, 2008 WL 170503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harvey D. Scott appeals from the judgment of $25,000.00 entered in his favor against Christopher N. Brodhacker. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harvey D. Scott appeals from the judgment of $25,000.00 entered in his favor against Christopher N. Brodhacker. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 S.W.3d 68, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 109, 2008 WL 170503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-brodhacker-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack