Home/Fourth Circuit/Scott v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

Scott v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

332 F. App'x 112
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2009·No. No. 09-1041·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

T. Michael Scott, Suffern Associates, LLC, Catherine C. Davis, and Michael D. Davis appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss their civil action and denying leave to amend their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 588 [113]*113F.Supp.2d 667 (W.D.Va.2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 332 F. App'x 112 (4th Cir. 2009).

332 F. App'x 112 (Scott v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.
588 F. Supp. 2d 667 (W.D. Virginia, 2008)