Scott v. Boyle

California Court of Appeal

Scott v. Boyle

25 Cal. App. 806

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 22, 1914

DocketCiv. No. 1457

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Cal. App. 806 (Scott v. Boyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Boyle, 25 Cal. App. 806 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The parties in the above-entitled cause having stipulated that the appeals from the judgment and order rendered in said cause in favor of the respondent, M. P. Scott, presents questions identical with those presented in the case of No. 1431, McEvers v. Boyle, ante, p. 476, [144 Pac. 308], decided by this court on September 21, 1914; that the facts in both cases are in all respects the same; and that all briefs and arguments filed and made on the appeal from the judgment in favor of the petitioner and respondent, J. W. McEvers (being case No. 1431), may be considered as made and filed in the appeal from the judgment and order in favor of said respondent M. P. Scott,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered upon the authority of the case of McEvers v. Boyle (Civ. No. 1431), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, that the order and judgment appealed from in the above-entitled cause be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The parties in the above-entitled cause having stipulated that the appeals from the judgment and order rendered in said cause in favor of the respondent, M. P. Scott, presents questions identical with those presented in the case of No. 1431, McEvers v. Boyle, ante, p. 476, [144 Pac. 308], decided by this court on September 21, 1914; that the facts in both cases are in all respects the same; and that all briefs and arguments filed and made on the appeal from the judgment in favor of the petitioner and respondent, J. W. McEvers (being case No. 1431), may be considered as made and filed in the appeal from the judgment and order in favor of said respondent M. P. Scott,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered upon the authority of the case of McEvers v. Boyle (Civ. No. 1431), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, that the order and judgment appealed from in the above-entitled cause be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Cal. App. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-boyle-calctapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack