Scott v. Boyle

144 P. 311, 25 Cal. App. 806, 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 269
California Court of Appeal·Decided September 22, 1914·No. Civ. No. 1457.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The parties in the above-entitled cause having stipulated that the appeals from the judgment and order rendered in said cause in favor of the respondent, M. P. Scott, presents questions identical with those presented in the case of No. 1431, McEvers v. Boyle, ante, p. 476, [144 P. 308], decided by this court on September 21, 1914; that the facts in both cases are in all respects the same; and that all briefs and arguments filed and made on the appeal from the judgment in favor of the petitioner and respondent, J. W. McEvers (being case No. 1431), may be considered as made and filed in the appeal from the judgment and order in favor of said respondent M. P. Scott,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered upon the authority of the case of McEvers v. Boyle (Civ. No. 1431), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, that the order and judgment appealed from in the above-entitled cause be, and the same are hereby affirmed. *Page 807

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Boyle, 144 P. 311, 25 Cal. App. 806, 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 269 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914).

144 P. 311 (Scott v. Boyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Western Bridge & Construction Co. v. Marsh
196 N.W. 130 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1923)