Scott v. Board of Education
This text of 16 A.D.2d 1009 (Scott v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record would sustain a verdict either for assault or negligence, and there is no contention that either is against the weight of evidence; but the record does not sustain a verdict found on both negligence and assault and is thus inconsistent. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to plaintiffs, and a new trial ordered unless within 10 days from notice of entry of the order herein, plaintiffs stipulate to a modification to base the judgment either on assault or negligence, in which event the judgment as thus modified is affirmed. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 1009, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1962.