Scott v. Bennett

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina
DecidedDecember 19, 2019
Docket3:18-cv-00583
StatusUnknown

This text of Scott v. Bennett (Scott v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Bennett, (W.D.N.C. 2019).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv-00583-FDW

PHILLIP R. SCOTT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER ) ) ) FNU BENNETT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Consent Motion for Entry of Protective Order [Doc. 22] by Defendant Jerline Bennett and Defendant Brenita Bennett (“Defendants”). Defendants seek the entry of a Protective Order that will control the production and dissemination of confidential documents, material, and information (“Confidential Information”). Counsel for Plaintiff, appearing for the limited purpose of assisting Plaintiff to conduct discovery, consents to this motion. [Doc. 22 at 1-2]. On review of the Defendants’ motion, the Court finds that during the course of this litigation, Defendants obtained and will continue to obtain and disclose to Plaintiff or the Court, information and documents from the North Carolina Department of Public Safety (“the Department”) that are deemed confidential under federal and state law, including, N.C.G.S. §§ 126-22(3) and -24, § 122C-52, § 132-1.7, § 148-74 and -76; Goble v. Bounds, 13 N.C. App. 579, 581, 186 S.E.2d 638, 639, aff’d, 281 N.C. 307, 188 S.E.2d 347 (1972); Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197, 200 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied,444 U.S. 925 (1979); 42 U.S.C. § 1320d et seq.; and 45 C.F.R. §§ 160-164. In light of the confidential nature of much of the information that will be produced in this litigation, a Protective Order is necessary to authorize the release of such confidential information and to ensure that such confidential information is not disclosed or used for any purpose except in connection with this litigation. The Motion [Doc. 22] is hereby GRANTED, and the Court enters the following order.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Scope of the Order. This Order applies to all information produced during written discovery, including any discovery exchanged prior to the entry of this Order. 2. Use of Confidential Information. All Confidential Information, as defined in this Order, shall be used solely in the prosecution or defense of this action, and shall not be used or disclosed by any person for any other purpose. 3. Disclosure. “Disclose” or “disclosure” means to provide, impart, transmit, transfer, convey, publish, or otherwise make available. 4. Confidential Information. “Confidential Information” consists of “General

Confidential Information” and “Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information,” which are defined as follows: A. “General Confidential Information” refers to and includes: i. Information and documents contained in “personnel files,” as that phrase is defined in N.C.G.S. § 126-22; ii. Information, documents, and related materials collected, created, and maintained by the Department pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 148-74, -76, - 118.5; and § 122C-52 iii. “Protected health information,” as that phrase is defined in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103; iv. Other information that is potentially embarrassing or invasive of the privacy of a person not a party to this litigation and therefore an appropriate subject of a protective order under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. B. “Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information” means:

i. “Personally Identifiable Information,” as that phrase is defined in 45 C.F.R. § 75.2, of current or former employees and contractors of the Department, such as but not limited to date of birth, social security numbers, home addresses and telephone numbers, insurance records or designations, medical and/or disability information, and other purely private information; ii. The personal financial records, telephone records, and e-mail records of current or former employees and contractors of the Department; and iii. Other non-public information as provided in N.C.G.S. § 132-1.7, which includes specific security information or detailed plans, patterns, or practices

associated with prison operations, such as certain investigations, security designations, staffing patterns and logs, schematic or other drawings and diagrams, and other sensitive security information. 5. Disclosure of General Confidential Information. General Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to anyone except: A. The court and its personnel; B. The parties to this action; C. Counsel for the parties to this action and employees of said counsel; D. Experts or consultants specifically retained by the parties or their attorneys to assist them in the preparation of this case or to serve as expert witnesses at the trial of this action, but only after execution of a Confidentiality Agreement as provided in Paragraph 8; and E. Court reporters or videographers engaged to record depositions, hearings, or the trial in this action.

6. Disclosure of Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information. Attorneys' Eyes Only Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to anyone except: A. The court and its personnel; B. Counsel for the parties to this action and employees of said counsel; C. Experts or consultants specifically retained by the parties or their attorneys to assist them in the preparation of this case or to serve as expert witnesses at the trial of this action, but only after execution of a Confidentiality Agreement as provided in Paragraph 8; and D. Court reporters or videographers engaged to record depositions, hearings, or the

trial in this action. 7. Withdrawal of Plaintiff’s Counsel. In the event that counsel for Plaintiff withdraws from representation and Plaintiff proceeds pro se, any Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information disclosed to counsel for Plaintiff may thereafter be disclosed to Plaintiff only upon the following conditions: A. Plaintiff must sign a Confidentiality Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and B. Prior to disclosing any Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information to Plaintiff, Counsel for Plaintiff agrees in writing to copy any documents marked as Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information onto red paper before providing said material to Plaintiff. If, after the conclusion of this litigation, Department officials, discover red papers marked as Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information, those officials are authorized to seize the documents and return them to the Department.

8. Confidentiality Agreements. Before Confidential Information or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information is disclosed to any person described in Paragraphs 5(d), 6(c), or 7, of this Order, counsel for the party disclosing the information shall inform the person to whom the disclosure is to be made that Confidential Information shall be used only for the purpose of the prosecution or defense of this action, and shall obtain from the person to whom the disclosure is to be made a signed a copy of the Confidentiality Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. Counsel for the party disclosing the Confidential Information to said person shall maintain the original Confidentiality Agreement and need not produce it except by agreement of the parties or upon order of the court.

9. Designation of Confidential Information. Information shall be designated as Confidential Information in the following manner: A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goble v. Bounds
188 S.E.2d 347 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1972)
Goble v. Bounds
186 S.E.2d 638 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott v. Bennett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-bennett-ncwd-2019.