Scott v. Bankers Trust & Audit Co.
115 S.E. 37, 29 Ga. App. 264, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 226
This text of 115 S.E. 37 (Scott v. Bankers Trust & Audit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scott v. Bankers Trust & Audit Co., 115 S.E. 37, 29 Ga. App. 264, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 226 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
1. This court cannot say, as a matter of law, that the judge erred in overruling the motion for continuance.
2. Under the pleadings and evidence in this case the court did nGt err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 37, 29 Ga. App. 264, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-bankers-trust-audit-co-gactapp-1922.