Scott v. Anderson

115 S.E. 917, 29 Ga. App. 438, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 54
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 8, 1923
Docket13421
StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 917 (Scott v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Anderson, 115 S.E. 917, 29 Ga. App. 438, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 54 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A plea of payment, or of an accord and satisfaction, is insufficient and subject to special demurrer when it does not allege with reasonable certainty the time and place of payment, but alleges only that a certain amount in accord and satisfaction was agreed upon and paid. Wortham v. Sinclair, 98 Ga. 173 (25 S. E. 414); Smith v. Mechanics National Bank, 108 Ga. 211 (33 S. E. 857).

2. The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction a petition for certiorari which complained of the verdict and judgment only upon the ground that the trial judge erred in striking such a plea as above indicated.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wortham v. Sinclair
25 S.E. 414 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Smith & Co. v. Mechanics National Bank
33 S.E. 857 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 917, 29 Ga. App. 438, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-anderson-gactapp-1923.