Scott v. American Tobacco Co.

731 So. 2d 189, 1999 WL 135082
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 26, 1999
Docket98-C-3016
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 731 So. 2d 189 (Scott v. American Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. American Tobacco Co., 731 So. 2d 189, 1999 WL 135082 (La. 1999).

Opinion

731 So.2d 189 (1999)

Gloria SCOTT and Deania M. Jackson, et al.
v.
The AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, et al.

No. 98-C-3016.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 26, 1999.

PER CURIAM.[*]

Denied. However, the conclusion of the court of appeal that the reasonable cost of necessary medical monitoring falls within the scope of defendant's liability was purely dicta, unrelated to the class certification issue. We do not consider the correctness of this conclusion, and the trial court should not feel bound by this conclusion when the issue is presented in that court.

VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would grant the writ.

NOTES

[*] Marcus, J., not on panel, recused. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

River Birch, Inc. v. ROBIN & ASSOC., INC.
906 So. 2d 729 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)
MANDALAY OIL & GAS v. Energy Develop. Corp.
880 So. 2d 129 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
Aydell v. Sterns
731 So. 2d 189 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
731 So. 2d 189, 1999 WL 135082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-american-tobacco-co-la-1999.