Scott v. Adams

New York Supreme Court

Scott v. Adams

12 Wend. 218

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 4, 1834

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Wend. 218 (Scott v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Adams, 12 Wend. 218 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

There is no pretence for saying that here more than a term intervenes between the teste and return of the writ. The word next, manifestly, by a clerical error, was substituted for instant. By the eighth day of July next, was meant the eighth day of July next after the seventh day of July, when the writ bore teste, and so I am disposed to read it. The motion therefore is denied, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

There is no pretence for saying that here more than a term intervenes between the teste and return of the writ. The word next, manifestly, by a clerical error, was substituted for instant. By the eighth day of July next, was meant the eighth day of July next after the seventh day of July, when the writ bore teste, and so I am disposed to read it. The motion therefore is denied, but without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Wend. 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-adams-nysupct-1834.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack