Scott Stanley v. Katherine Springer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Scott Stanley v. Katherine Springer

DecidedNovember 16, 2006

Docket13-06-00157-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Scott Stanley v. Katherine Springer (Scott Stanley v. Katherine Springer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott Stanley v. Katherine Springer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-06-157-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

SCOTT STANLEY, Appellant,

v.

KATHERINE SPRINGER, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, SCOTT STANLEY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number F-1591-01-E. After the clerk's record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that he no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of November, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-06-157-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

SCOTT STANLEY, Appellant,

v.

KATHERINE SPRINGER, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, SCOTT STANLEY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number F-1591-01-E. After the clerk's record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that he no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of November, 2006.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Scott Stanley v. Katherine Springer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-stanley-v-katherine-springer-texapp-2006.