Scott Schumacher v. State of Texas Dallas County

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 2024
Docket05-24-00145-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Scott Schumacher v. State of Texas Dallas County (Scott Schumacher v. State of Texas Dallas County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott Schumacher v. State of Texas Dallas County, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 4, 2024

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00145-CV

SCOTT SCHUMACHER, Appellant V. DALLAS COUNTY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TX-22-00673

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Smith, Miskel, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Breedlove This appeal, challenging the trial court’s January 24, 2023 final default

judgment, was filed February 9, 2024. Because the appeal was filed well over a year

after the judgment was signed and appeared untimely, we informed appellant that

the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless he demonstrated

the appeal was, in fact, timely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (setting deadlines for filing

notice of appeal ranging from twenty days to six months from date judgment or

appealable order signed, depending on type of judgment or order being appealed);

Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (timely filing of notice of appeal is

jurisdictional). Appellant filed a brief in response, but the brief addresses the merits

of the appeal rather than demonstrating our jurisdiction. Accordingly, because the

notice of appeal was not timely filed, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a).

/Maricela Breedlove/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE JUSTICE 240145F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SCOTT SCHUMACHER, Appellant On Appeal from the 95th District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-24-00145-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. TX-22-00673. Opinion delivered by Justice DALLAS COUNTY, PARKLAND Breedlove, Justices Smith and Miskel HOSPITAL DISTRICT, DALLAS participating. COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, DALLAS COUNTY SCHOOL EQUALIZATION FUND, DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND CITY OF DALLAS, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees Dallas County, Parkland Hospital District, Dallas County Community College District, Dallas County School Equalization Fund, Dallas Independent School District, and City of Dallas recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Scott Schumacher.

Judgment entered June 4, 2024.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C.
302 S.W.3d 542 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott Schumacher v. State of Texas Dallas County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-schumacher-v-state-of-texas-dallas-county-texapp-2024.