Scott Ralph Wheelock v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 6, 2020
Docket04-19-00466-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Scott Ralph Wheelock v. State (Scott Ralph Wheelock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott Ralph Wheelock v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 6, 2020

No. 04-19-00466-CR

Scott Ralph WHEELOCK, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. B18291 Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER By order dated December 18, 2019, the District Clerk of Kerr County was ordered to provide appellant, who is representing himself pro se, with a complete, duplicate copy of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record for trial court cause number B18291. Pending before the court are numerous motions filed by appellant. In his cover letter to his Motion and Request for Copies of Documents of “Stricken Appendix”, appellant states he had not received a copy of the record from the District Clerk of Kerr County. The cover letter is dated January 1, 2020, and was filed in this court on January 6, 2020.

On December 27, 2019, the District Clerk of Kerr County filed written proof in this court that the copy of the record was sent to appellant on December 26, 2019. Accordingly, it appears appellant may not have received the copy of the record by the date he sent the January 1, 2020 cover letter. Because it appears appellant may not have timely received the record, the deadline for filing the appellant’s brief is EXTENDED to March 2, 2020.

Appellant’s Motion to Request All Files from Attorney is GRANTED IN PART. It is ORDERED that Mr. Douglas S. Daniel provide appellant with a complete copy of his file in trial court cause number B18291. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Daniel file written proof that a copy of the file was sent to appellant no later than ten days from the date of this order.

Appellant’s Motion and Request for Copies of Documents of “Stricken Appendix” is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to appellant requesting copies of specific documents that are not included in the clerk’s record provided by the District Clerk of Kerr County. Appellant’s brief must contain proper record citations to any documents referenced in his brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g), (i). This court will not consider any documents included in an appendix to appellant’s brief that are not contained in the clerk’s record. See Blank v. State, 172 S.W.3d 673, 675 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2005, no pet.) (not designated for publication).

Appellant’s Motion for Resentencing is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to appellant including any arguments relating to resentencing in his brief. The clerk of this court is instructed to forward a copy of appellant’s motion to the trial court clerk for filing.

The State’s Motion for Access to All Filings is GRANTED. The clerk of this court is instructed to make appellant’s filings available to the State through the court’s website.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blank v. State
172 S.W.3d 673 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott Ralph Wheelock v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-ralph-wheelock-v-state-texapp-2020.