Scott Philip Sandidge v. State
This text of Scott Philip Sandidge v. State (Scott Philip Sandidge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
_____________________________________________________________
SCOTT PHILIP SANDIDGE, Appellant,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Scott Philip Sandidge, filed a notice of appeal challenging his conviction for indecency of a child. By order signed January 3, 2008, the trial court granted appellant's motion for new trial.
When the trial court grants a motion for new trial, it restores the case to its position before the former trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(b). Because there is no conviction to be appealed, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643-44 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1996, no pet.).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the trial court's order granting a new trial, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 6th day of March, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott Philip Sandidge v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-philip-sandidge-v-state-texapp-2008.