Scott Nickell v. Mary A. Wassef

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
• Decided: December 31, 2025
• Docket: 01-25-00566-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued December 31, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00566-CV ——————————— SCOTT NICKELL, Appellant V. MARY A. WASSEF, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-61379

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 23, 2025. Appellant has not

paid for the clerk’s record or the required filing fee and has not established indigence

for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1 (indigence), 37.3(b)

(allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a); Order Regarding Fees Charged

in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the

Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. Appellant

failed to respond to our notice of August 26, 2025 (non-payment for the clerk’s

record) and August 20, 2025 (past due filing fee), that, should appellant not pay the

fee for the clerk’s record or the filing fee or establish indigence, this appeal was

subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule), 37.3(b)

(allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault),

42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant has not responded to

this Court’s notices.

We dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.