Scott Meyer v. Gayla Rahn
This text of Scott Meyer v. Gayla Rahn (Scott Meyer v. Gayla Rahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 25-1028 ___________________________
Scott Meyer
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Gayla Rahn, Olmsted County Court Clerk; Kim Pietrzak, Olmsted County Court Clerk; Hans Holland; Olmsted County Court; John/Jane Doe
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: May 29, 2025 Filed: June 3, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Minnesota resident Scott Meyer appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to state a claim. After careful consideration of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court properly dismissed Meyer’s claims. See Vigeant v. Meek, 953 F.3d 1022, 1024 (8th Cir. 2020) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott Meyer v. Gayla Rahn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-meyer-v-gayla-rahn-ca8-2025.