Scott McCluen v. The Roane County Times, Inc., D/B/A The Standard and Gerald Largen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedJuly 9, 1996
Docket03A01-9512-CV-00434
StatusPublished

This text of Scott McCluen v. The Roane County Times, Inc., D/B/A The Standard and Gerald Largen (Scott McCluen v. The Roane County Times, Inc., D/B/A The Standard and Gerald Largen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott McCluen v. The Roane County Times, Inc., D/B/A The Standard and Gerald Largen, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTI ON FILED July 9, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk

SCOTT M CLUEN c ) ROANE COUNTY ) 03A01- 9512- CV- 00434 Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt ) ) ) v. ) HON. J OHN B. HAGLER, ) J UDGE ) ( Si t t i ng by I nt e r c ha nge ) THE ROANE COUNTY TI M ES, I NC. , ) d / b / a THE STANDARD, a nd ) GERALD LARGEN ) ) De f e nda nt s - Appe l l e e s ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED

J OHN D. KI TCH OF NASHVI LLE a nd GEORGE ALLEN OF GOODLETTSVI LLE FOR APPELLANT

GERALD LARGEN OF KI NGSTON FOR APPELLEES

O P I N I O N

Godda r d, P. J .

Thi s i s a s ui t b y Sc ot t M Cl ue n, Count y At t or ne y f or c

Ro a n e Count y, a ga i ns t The Roa ne Count y Ti me s , I nc . , d/ b/ a The

St a n d a r d, a nd i t s owne r a nd publ i s he r Ge r a l d La r ge n, s e e ki ng

d a ma g e s f or l i be l i nc i de nt t o t wo s e pa r a t e publ i c a t i ons i n The

St a n d a r d. The Tr i a l Cour t di r e c t e d a ve r di c t i n f a vor of t he

De f e n d a nt s a t t he c onc l us i on of t he Pl a i nt i f f ' s pr oof be c a us e M . r

M Cl u e n ha d not s hown t ha t M . La r ge n ma l i c i ous l y publ i s he d t h e c r

ma t e r i a l .

M . M Cl ue n a ppe a l s , i n s i s t i ng t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t wa s r c

i n e r r or .

By wa y of ba c kgr ound, i t a ppe a r s t ha t pr e vi ous t o t h e

p u b l i c a t i on of t he a r t i c l e s i n que s t i on, M . La r ge n wa s r

i n s t r u me nt a l i n s e c ur i ng t he t e r mi na t i on of M . M Cl ue n' s f a t h e r r c

a s Ch a i r ma n of t he Ha r r i ma n Hos pi t a l Boa r d a nd t ha t M . M Cl ue n r c

h a d b r o ught t o t he a t t e nt i on of t he Count y Commi s s i on i n i t s J u l y

1 2 , 1 9 9 3, me e t i ng t ha t M . La r ge n' s l a w of f i c e e qui pme nt ha d b e e n r

r e mo v e d f r om t he t a x r ol l s , a l t hough he wa s c ont i nui ng i n t he

p r a c t i c e of l a w. I t a l s o a ppe a r s t ha t M . La r ge n t ook e xc e pt i o n r

t o Ro a n e Count y' s i s s ua nc e of $15, 000, 000 i n bonds f or

i mp r o v e me nt of s c hool s wi t hout a r e f e r e ndum whe n a n e a r l i e r

$ 2 0 , 0 0 0 , 000 bond i s s ue , whi c h i nc l ude d c ons ol i da t i on of c e r t a i n

s c h o o l s , ha d be e n de f e a t e d by r e f e r e ndum.

Two s e pa r a t e a c t s - - one by t he Count y a nd one by M . r

M Cl u e n - - pr ompt e d t he publ i c a t i on of t he a r t i c l e s s ue d upon. c In

1 9 8 8 t h e Count y e nt e r e d i nt o a c ont r a c t wi t h I nt e r na t i ona l

M t a l s Compa ny ( I M e CO) , whe r e by I MCO wa s gi ve n a r e duc e d r a t e f o r

i t s u s e of a s ol i d wa s t e s a ni t a r y l a ndf i l l ope r a t e d by t he

Co u n t y . Pa r t of t he c ons i de r a t i on f or t he r e duc e d r a t e wa s t h e

2 t r a n s f e r of 100 a c r e s owne d by I MCO t o t he Count y. Subs e que nt l y

a n d a f t e r t he Count y Budge t Di r e c t or poi nt e d out t ha t t he r a t e

pa i d by I MCO wa s c ons i de r a bl y l e s s t ha n c os t of r e c e i vi ng a nd

p r o c e s s i ng i t s r e f uge , t he Count y a nd I MCO e nt e r e d i nt o a s e c o n d

c o n t r a c t whi c h pur por t e d t o r e s c i nd t he f i r s t a nd, i nt e r a l i a ,

f o r t h e Count y t o r e t ur n t o I MCO a ppr oxi ma t e l y one - ha l f of t he

r e a l e s t a t e pr e vi ous l y t r a ns f e r r e d.

The ot he r a c t p r ompt i ng t he a r t i c l e wa s M . M Cl ue n' s r c

r e p o r t t o t he Commi s s i on wi t h r e ga r d t o M . La r ge n' s t a x s t a t u s r

h e r e i n b e f or e not e d.

The por t i ons of a r t i c l e s i n que s t i on a s s e t out i n t h e

c omp l a i nt a r e a s f ol l ows :

J ul y 14, 1993

Edi t or i a l Comme nt s / Le t t e r s - - The Tr ut h Hur t s

" How e l s e t o e xpl a i n why t hi s gr oup of me n a nd one wo ma n, who we r e e l e c t e d t o l ook a f t e r t he c ount y' s b u s i ne s s a nd p r ot e c t i t s i nt e r e s t s , woul d, a t a me e t i ng t h e pr i ma r y bus i ne s s of whi c h i s , unde r t he s t a t ut e s , t o pa s s a budge t a nd s e t a t a x r a t e , i ns t e a d de vot e mu c h of t he i r me e t i ng not t o t he i r a nd t he pe opl e ' s p r ope r c onc e r ns , but r a t he r t o a ha r a ngue a t t a c ki ng t he p u bl i s he r of t hi s pa p e r f or t e l l i ng t he t r ut h a bout t he m a nd t he i r d e a l wi t h I M CO? "

" Nowhe r e , howe ve r , i n a l l hi s bl e a t i ng a nd br e a s t - b e a t i ng doe s he poi nt out a s i ngl e unt r ut h or a s i ngl e mi s s t a t e me nt of f a c t ; t hi s f or t he r e a s on t ha t our a r t i c l e wa s t r ue , a s he we l l kne w. "

" And a l l hi s br a gga do c i o s wa gge r a nd bl us t e r a bout s u i ng us i s bl a t he r , a s we c oul d de mons t r a t e poi nt by p o i nt , but i t i s our pol i c y ne ve r t o e nga ge i n ba t t l e

3 o f wi t s [ s i c ] wi t h a n una r me d ma n. " ( Br a c ke t e d wor d i n c o mpl a i nt . )

" I t i s , howe ve r , di s t ur bi ng t o f i nd t ha t our c ount y a t t or ne y a nd s i x of our c ommi s s i one r s ha ve not hi ng b e t t e r t o d o t ha n t o t r y t o i nt i mi da t e a c i t i z e n by h a vi ng t he t a x a s s e s s or i nve s t i ga t e hi m, wi t h t he i mpl i e d t hr e a t t ha t hi s t a xe s ought t o be r a i s e d b e c a us e he ha s t ol d t he t r ut h a bout t he m. "

" Thi s s ound l i ke t he da ys of t he Ni xon W t e Hous e a nd hi t h e a t t e mpt e d us e of t he I RS t o i nt i mi da t e t hos e on hi s ' e ne mi e s l i s t . ' "

" I t i s pr oba bl y no c oi nc i de nc e t ha t t he l e a de r s of t he ' g a ng of s i x' we r e t h e s a me one s who s pe a r - he a de d t he e f f or t t o i gnor e a nd a br oga t e t he wi l l of t he pe opl e a s e x pr e s s e d i n a r e f e r e ndum a ga i ns t t he 20 pl us mi l l i on d o l l a r bond i s s ue , a nd who di d i n f a c t put t he pe opl e i n ' bonda ge ' f or s ome 14 mi l l i on dol l a r s , a ga i ns t t he p e opl e ' s wi s he s . "

" Ho we ve r , we wi l l c ont i nue t o t e l l t he t r ut h on M . r M Cl ue n a nd hi s ' ga ng of s i x' a nd t he y ma y r e s t c a s s ur e d, we wi l l not be s i l e nc e d, we wi l l not be i n t i mi da t e d, a nd we wi l l not be f r i ght e ne d by s uc h wi l l - of - t he - wi s ps a s t he s e s e ve n. "

J ul y 21, 1993

The I MCO- - Cha pt e r 2- - Do W St i l l Own Our La nd? e

" W t hi nk t ha t , ha d M . M Cl ue n c ons ul t e d wi t h a e r c l a wye r , he woul d ha ve di s c ove r e d t ha t one of t he r u di me nt a r y e qui t a bl e pr i nc i pl e s a ppl i e d t o a r e s c i s s i on i s t ha t bot h pa r t i e s t o a r e s c i s s i on mus t h a ve r e s t or e d t o t he m t he t hi ngs t he y or r i ght s t he y g a ve up a s c ons i de r a t i on f or t he or i gi na l c ont r a c t . "

" The r e f or e , i t i s obv i ous t ha t t he r e ha s be e n no r e s c i s s i on. The r e ha s be e n a not he r ' s we e t - he a r t ' de a l a t t he e xpe ns e of t he t a xpa ye r s a nd t he ot he r us e r s of t he l a ndf i l l . "

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
376 U.S. 254 (Supreme Court, 1964)
St. Amant v. Thompson
390 U.S. 727 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
418 U.S. 323 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Schy v. Hearst Pub. Co.
205 F.2d 750 (Seventh Circuit, 1953)
Williams v. Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc.
179 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Fram v. Yellow Cab Company of Pittsburgh
380 F. Supp. 1314 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
Bleecker v. Drury
149 F.2d 770 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Brown v. Newman
454 S.W.2d 120 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1970)
Stones River Motors, Inc. v. Mid-South Publishing Co.
651 S.W.2d 713 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1983)
Malone v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
38 F. Supp. 369 (S.D. Mississippi, 1941)
Goode v. Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc.
783 S.W.2d 184 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1989)
Press, Inc. v. Verran
569 S.W.2d 435 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)
Hunt v. Gerlemann
581 S.W.2d 913 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Price v. Price
606 S.W.2d 51 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ward v. Merriam
78 N.E. 745 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott McCluen v. The Roane County Times, Inc., D/B/A The Standard and Gerald Largen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-mccluen-v-the-roane-county-times-inc-dba-the-tennctapp-1996.