Scott-Mattson Farms, Inc. v. Carbajal

Supreme Court of Florida

Scott-Mattson Farms, Inc. v. Carbajal

189 So. 2d 611, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3196

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 8, 1966

DocketNo. 35077

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 2d 611 (Scott-Mattson Farms, Inc. v. Carbajal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott-Mattson Farms, Inc. v. Carbajal, 189 So. 2d 611, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3196 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 17, 1965. ■

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [612]*612there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Attorney for Respondent Antonio Carba-jal is granted a fee in the sum of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI