Scott Lawrence Probst v. Comerica Bank, et al.
This text of Scott Lawrence Probst v. Comerica Bank, et al. (Scott Lawrence Probst v. Comerica Bank, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
SCOTT LAWRENCE PROBST,
Plaintiff, v. Hon. Jane M. Beckering
COMERICA BANK, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-954
Defendants. ________________________________/
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before me on Defendant Comerica Bank’s proposed order granting Motion to Cancel Notice of Lis Pendens and Enjoin Future Recordings (ECF No. 48), which was referred to the undersigned for report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). For the reasons set forth in my January 30, 2026 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 42), I recommend that the Court enter Defendant Comerica Bank’s proposed order (ECF No. 48) granting Comerica’s Motion to Cancel Notice of Lis Pendens and Enjoin Future Recordings (ECF No. 39).
Date: March 13, 2026 /s/ Sally J. Berens SALLY J. BERENS U.S. Magistrate Judge
OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of service of this notice. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott Lawrence Probst v. Comerica Bank, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-lawrence-probst-v-comerica-bank-et-al-miwd-2026.